Share this post on:

Ry clinical MedChemExpress JW 74 samples were sequenced successfully in this study with similar Phred quality. There were seven samples that could not be sequenced completely. More specifically: full PB2, PB1, PA, HA, NP, and NS sequences were not obtainable from 2, 3, 3, 2, 1, 2 of these seven samples, respectively. Of these 13 failures, nine were from two samples with Ct values of 28.72 and 29.04, respectively. The PB1 and PA genes encountered the highest failure rate relative to the others.PCR SensitivityThe 15 RNA samples Dimethylenastron extracted directly from the clinical samples were of quantification cycle values ranging from 21.0 to 30.56 (equivalent to 2.46103?.46106 viral RNA copies/mL of RNA extract) [24]. All of the gene segments from both the clinical and MDCK-cultured samples collected from 2009?011 were successfully amplified and appeared as specific and discernibleDiscussionTraditionally, Sanger sequencing is performed on purified PCR amplicons to prevent background noise generated during sequencing analyses. Here, it was found possible to employ a non-purified amplicon approach for direct sequencing, which minimized processing time and effort for large-scale viral genome sequencing that produced consistently high quality sequencingTable 1. Summary of sequencing primers employed in this study and their respective performance.Segment/fragment CGGAGAGAAATGAACAAGGACAAAC TCTCTCTAACATGTATGCAACCATCA CAARGCTGCAATGGGATTGAG TCTCATTGACATCTCTGTGCTTGG GCCAATACAGTGGGTTTGTCAGAAC TCCRTAYCTTCTGTCTTCCTTACCT GATGGACCACTACCTGAGGATAATG GGTCATGTTGTCYCTTACTCTCC ATCAACCTGAGTGGTTCAGAAACATC 18204824 TCATGATYTGGTGCATTCACTATGAG ATAGRTGCCATAGAGGAGACACACA ATCGGTCTCCTATATGAACTACTAG GGTAGAACTTGACRATCCAAATGC GTTTCTTCGCCTCTTTCGGACTG TCCAARTTCCTCCTGATGGATGC CTGTAYCCAGCTTGAAAGTGACCT TGACCCGAGAATTGAGCCAC AAATCCTTCCAATTGTGGTGATGC TATTGGGAGACCCTCADTGTGATG GGGTCAACCAATTCAATCTACTAAAGA TTGATCTAACTGACTCAGAAATGAAC ACAGTTTGTTCATTTCTGARTCAGTTA ACAGTTTGTTCATTTCTGARTCAATTA GCAAAAAACATGATATGGCAAAGGA ATCCAAATGTGCACTGAACTTAAAC CGYCCATTYTCACCTCTCCA CTAACGAGAATCCAGCACACAAGAG CGTATTTCCAGTGAATGCTGCCA GGYGGRGACATCTGGGTGAC ATGCTATGCACACTTGCTTGGTC CCATTGATACAAACGCATTCTGACT AAATGACGTGTGGATGGGRAGAAC CACAACAATACTGTTYGAGGTCCA GCCCCCTCAAAGCCGAGA CTGGCCAARACCATTCTGTTCTC 1419?393 1419?393 1656?632 166?90 683?64 998?022 1344?322 350?69 551?29 723?99 1090?113 1354?331 23148522 78?5 573?51 GU907115 GU907119 GU907120 75.69 (11.79) 88.28 (8.19) 91.71 (5.63) 90.46 (4.60) 88.65 (7.16) 90.32 (4.46) 88.24 (10.79) 87.70 (6.05) 88.12 (7.04) 90.43 (5.87) 89.32 (5.56) 90.42 (4.21) 86.43 (8.36) 94.00 (5.24) 95.21 (4.06) 93.66 (4.17) 93.33 (5.47) 93.53 (3.39) 92.38 (8.81) 93.66 (3.37) 91.74 (6.11) 94.36 (3.94) 92.81 (1.93) 94.10 (1.30) 1387?412 543?17 286?09 1998?975 GU907114 1608?627 1248?225 862?84 623?01 210?33 GU907117 2150?126 1700?724 91.20 (3.87) 89.21 (6.23) 90.40 (7.02) 89.82 (5.04) 90.78 (3.85) 91.55 (8.56) 92.89 (3.16) 90.37 (6.22) 88.85 (5.64) 89.77 (6.92) 88.61 (5.25) 85.39 (14.55) 1394?369 90.25 (5.11) 1007?032 86.18 (5.45) 612?90 89.39 (5.70) 232?56 AB441948 91.70 (3.96) 2142?118 89.27 (4.83) 1796?820 92.69 (3.74) 1455?432 90.00 (6.36) 94.31 (4.83) 94.58 (3.37) 93.79 (4.11) 94.56 (3.93) 93.43 (4.77) 92.83 (4.38) 93.72 (4.52) 94.93 (3.49) 94.24 (5.56) 93.96 (4.66) 92.96 (4.66) 94.85 (2.96) 94.21 (7.83) 95.71 (2.73) 93.16 (8.56) 94.39 (3.70) 93.20 (6.23) 91.77 (4.79) 91.35 (10.33) 960?80 89.93 (5.82) 94.33 (4.69) 654?29 89.87 (7.45) 94.45 (5.05) 230?54 GU907121 91.62 (5.62) 94.46 (4.80)PrimersPrimer sequence (59-39)Nucleotide position (59.Ry clinical samples were sequenced successfully in this study with similar Phred quality. There were seven samples that could not be sequenced completely. More specifically: full PB2, PB1, PA, HA, NP, and NS sequences were not obtainable from 2, 3, 3, 2, 1, 2 of these seven samples, respectively. Of these 13 failures, nine were from two samples with Ct values of 28.72 and 29.04, respectively. The PB1 and PA genes encountered the highest failure rate relative to the others.PCR SensitivityThe 15 RNA samples extracted directly from the clinical samples were of quantification cycle values ranging from 21.0 to 30.56 (equivalent to 2.46103?.46106 viral RNA copies/mL of RNA extract) [24]. All of the gene segments from both the clinical and MDCK-cultured samples collected from 2009?011 were successfully amplified and appeared as specific and discernibleDiscussionTraditionally, Sanger sequencing is performed on purified PCR amplicons to prevent background noise generated during sequencing analyses. Here, it was found possible to employ a non-purified amplicon approach for direct sequencing, which minimized processing time and effort for large-scale viral genome sequencing that produced consistently high quality sequencingTable 1. Summary of sequencing primers employed in this study and their respective performance.Segment/fragment CGGAGAGAAATGAACAAGGACAAAC TCTCTCTAACATGTATGCAACCATCA CAARGCTGCAATGGGATTGAG TCTCATTGACATCTCTGTGCTTGG GCCAATACAGTGGGTTTGTCAGAAC TCCRTAYCTTCTGTCTTCCTTACCT GATGGACCACTACCTGAGGATAATG GGTCATGTTGTCYCTTACTCTCC ATCAACCTGAGTGGTTCAGAAACATC 18204824 TCATGATYTGGTGCATTCACTATGAG ATAGRTGCCATAGAGGAGACACACA ATCGGTCTCCTATATGAACTACTAG GGTAGAACTTGACRATCCAAATGC GTTTCTTCGCCTCTTTCGGACTG TCCAARTTCCTCCTGATGGATGC CTGTAYCCAGCTTGAAAGTGACCT TGACCCGAGAATTGAGCCAC AAATCCTTCCAATTGTGGTGATGC TATTGGGAGACCCTCADTGTGATG GGGTCAACCAATTCAATCTACTAAAGA TTGATCTAACTGACTCAGAAATGAAC ACAGTTTGTTCATTTCTGARTCAGTTA ACAGTTTGTTCATTTCTGARTCAATTA GCAAAAAACATGATATGGCAAAGGA ATCCAAATGTGCACTGAACTTAAAC CGYCCATTYTCACCTCTCCA CTAACGAGAATCCAGCACACAAGAG CGTATTTCCAGTGAATGCTGCCA GGYGGRGACATCTGGGTGAC ATGCTATGCACACTTGCTTGGTC CCATTGATACAAACGCATTCTGACT AAATGACGTGTGGATGGGRAGAAC CACAACAATACTGTTYGAGGTCCA GCCCCCTCAAAGCCGAGA CTGGCCAARACCATTCTGTTCTC 1419?393 1419?393 1656?632 166?90 683?64 998?022 1344?322 350?69 551?29 723?99 1090?113 1354?331 23148522 78?5 573?51 GU907115 GU907119 GU907120 75.69 (11.79) 88.28 (8.19) 91.71 (5.63) 90.46 (4.60) 88.65 (7.16) 90.32 (4.46) 88.24 (10.79) 87.70 (6.05) 88.12 (7.04) 90.43 (5.87) 89.32 (5.56) 90.42 (4.21) 86.43 (8.36) 94.00 (5.24) 95.21 (4.06) 93.66 (4.17) 93.33 (5.47) 93.53 (3.39) 92.38 (8.81) 93.66 (3.37) 91.74 (6.11) 94.36 (3.94) 92.81 (1.93) 94.10 (1.30) 1387?412 543?17 286?09 1998?975 GU907114 1608?627 1248?225 862?84 623?01 210?33 GU907117 2150?126 1700?724 91.20 (3.87) 89.21 (6.23) 90.40 (7.02) 89.82 (5.04) 90.78 (3.85) 91.55 (8.56) 92.89 (3.16) 90.37 (6.22) 88.85 (5.64) 89.77 (6.92) 88.61 (5.25) 85.39 (14.55) 1394?369 90.25 (5.11) 1007?032 86.18 (5.45) 612?90 89.39 (5.70) 232?56 AB441948 91.70 (3.96) 2142?118 89.27 (4.83) 1796?820 92.69 (3.74) 1455?432 90.00 (6.36) 94.31 (4.83) 94.58 (3.37) 93.79 (4.11) 94.56 (3.93) 93.43 (4.77) 92.83 (4.38) 93.72 (4.52) 94.93 (3.49) 94.24 (5.56) 93.96 (4.66) 92.96 (4.66) 94.85 (2.96) 94.21 (7.83) 95.71 (2.73) 93.16 (8.56) 94.39 (3.70) 93.20 (6.23) 91.77 (4.79) 91.35 (10.33) 960?80 89.93 (5.82) 94.33 (4.69) 654?29 89.87 (7.45) 94.45 (5.05) 230?54 GU907121 91.62 (5.62) 94.46 (4.80)PrimersPrimer sequence (59-39)Nucleotide position (59.

Share this post on:

Author: Ubiquitin Ligase- ubiquitin-ligase