Share this post on:

tive connections. Numerically, it represents the product of Computer (last author articles) OC CC. Circle sizes indicate TTP values normalized towards the maximum. Colored circles and numbers indicate authors with ten highest values. Their names are shown on the appropriate. Gray circles with colored border indicate authors with TTP values above zero. (B) Log10(TTP) values and their relative frequency distribution. (C) Scatterplots with circles representing person authors (indicated by color; distinct from panels A,B) with their TTP values (log10) plotted against the total variety of c-Raf Molecular Weight citing articles (left; Cit. Ct.; log10 values) and their H indices (middle) and with their H indices plotted against the total quantity of citing articles (correct; log10 values). Numbers represent correlation coefficients [Spearman’s rho values; two-sided test; n = 126; S = 90,803 (left)/47,558 (middle)/75,414 (suitable); p 10-10 ]. Citation-related parameters were IKK╬Á web calculated from bibliographic records obtained by a Web of Science query (Clarivate Analytics).primarily driven by authors contributing single articles, as their number grew steadily. The balance of authors publishing within the field for a lot more than 1 year has grow to be adverse within the final years, however the variety of authors leaving the field inside the last years is inherently inaccurate (Figure 1D).Scanu et al., 1955) and MS (Chiavacci and Sperry, 1952; Poser and Curran, 1958). The amount of articles published per year remained relatively low until the 1990s and enhanced thereafter. Because 2000, the annual count of articles has grown linearly reaching around 300 articles per year in 2020 (Figure 1A). The amount of authors listed on the short article byline grew in parallel, however at a considerably stronger pace reaching a lot more than 2,000 per year within the final years (Figure 1B). The strong expansion from the workforce was as a result of an increasing variety of authors per short article (Figure 1C). Notably, the expansion of your field wasPUBLICATION RECORDS, Household RELATIONS, AND COLLABORATIVE CONNECTIONS In the FIELDMore details about the workforce might be drawn by analyzing the authors on distinct positions from the write-up byline, which indicate the roles and contributions of authors (Claxton, 2005; Marusiet al., 2011). A total of three,one hundred authors was c listed around the final byline position of articles identifying theseFrontiers in Aging Neuroscience | frontiersin.orgNovember 2021 | Volume 13 | ArticlePfriegerWorkforce Studying Neurodegeneration and CholesterolFIGURE 7 | Workforce composition and overlap across chosen diseases. (A) Fractions of authors contributing single articles in comparison with the total workforce (Sgl.), of collaborating authors among last authors (Col.) and of authors with household ties amongst last authors (Fam.) in indicated fields (AD, Alzheimer’s illness; MS, various sclerosis; PD, Parkinson’s disease; ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; HD, Huntington’s disease). Black circles and lines indicate imply and standard deviation (n = five), respectively. (B) Histogram displaying the fraction of last authors that contributed articles to the indicated quantity of fields. (C) Diagram displaying connections in between two ailments which can be established by final authors contributing to both fields. Names and colored lines indicate the final authors together with the highest variety of connections (n = 6). Circle size represents the amount of connections normalized to the maximum (AD; 160 links).FIGURE 6 | Development from the disease-specific workforce. Line plots showin

Share this post on:

Author: Ubiquitin Ligase- ubiquitin-ligase