Red, these models should be employed with caution. caution. To underscore the size impact on behaviour, Figure 9 presents the ratio Vpred/Vexp asas behaviour, Figure 9 presents the ratio Vpred /Vexp a a function specimen successful depth. In Within this figure, arrow represents the trend of of function of of specimen powerful depth. this figure, thethe arrow represents the trendthe the curves, highlighting the path of evolution on the (Vpred (Vpred /Vexp as the beam curves, highlighting the path of evolution of your ratio ratio /Vexp) as the )beam size insize increases. It is actually apparent that the ratio Vpred /Vexp was on either side of the reference creases. It really is apparent that the ratio Vpred/Vexp was scattered scattered on either side with the reference line corresponding exp = 1 in pretty much in codes all codes except for (2001) model, line corresponding to Vpred/Vto Vpred /Vexp = 1 all pretty much except for the JSCEthe JSCE (2001) model, where virtually all of the FIIN-1 web points were above the reference where virtually each of the points were above the reference line. line.7 6CSA-S6-7 6CSA-S806-Vpred / Vexp4 3 2 1 0 one hundred 7 six five 200 300 400 d (mm) 500 600Vpred / Vexp4 three two 1 0 100 eight 7 six 200 300 400 d (mm) 500 600ACI-440.JSCEVpred / Vexp4 3 two 1 0 one hundred 200 300 400 d (mm) 500 600Vpred / Vexp5 four three two 1 0 one hundred 200 300 400 d (mm) 500 Xaliproden Neuronal Signaling 600Figure 9. Cont.CivilEng 2021, 2 CivilEng 2021, two, FOR PEER REVIEW8917 6fib-TG9.3-7 6fib-TG5.1-Vpred / Vexp4 3 2 1 0 one hundred 200 300 400 d (mm) 500 600Vpred / Vexp4 three two 1 0 one hundred 200 300 400 d (mm) 500 600Figure Influence of size impact on V pred /Vexp ratio. Figure 9.9. Influence of size impact on V pred/Vexp ratio.The curve trends clearly reveal that the influence of the size impact was moderate for influence fib-TG5.1-19 2019 [23], CSA-S6-19 (2019) [21], and ACI-440.2R-17 (2017) [20] compared fib-TG5.1-19 compared with CSA-S806-12 (2012) [22] and fib-TG9.3-01 (2001) [24]. In contrast, in line with the fib-TG9.3-01 (2001) [24]. JSCE (2001) [25] predictions, the shape in the curve trend was sharply ascending, which trend was sharply ascending, which confirmed that the influence in the size effect is very pronounced. Note that there has been confirmed that the influence in the size impact is extremely pronounced. Note that there has been a important improvement within the influence with the size impact inside the updated version with the a considerable improvement inside the influence of your size effect in the updated version from the European code (fib-TG5.1-19 2019). Indeed, from the curve trend in the new version with the European code (fib-TG5.1-19 2019). Certainly, from the curve trend from the new version in the fib-TG5.1-19 (2019) code, which can be connected with the greatest curve shown in Figure 9, it can fib-TG5.1-19 (2019) code, which is connected with all the greatest curve shown in Figure 9, it can be observed that the size impact has significantly significantly less influence the Vpred/Vexp ratio ratio as be observed that the size effect has drastically much less influence onon the Vpred /Vexp as beam beam size increases. size increases. It might as a result be concluded in the overview of existing codes and design and style guidelines It might as a result be concluded in the assessment of current codes and design suggestions that the size effect is unfortunately not taken into consideration in in at the moment utilized predicthat the size effect is unfortunately not taken into consideration currently applied prediction models. Offered the the significant influence the size impact can have on the efficiency of tion models.
